So, try it yourself and evaluate your essay based on our examples. A few reminders About essay scoring: The new SAT essay has a different scoring rubric than the old essay, which we go over here. About comparing essays: Writing an 8-point essay can be really, really hard to do, even for capable writers.
As Elizabeth referred to in this post , 50 minutes is not a lot of time to read and analyze a text and then write a beautifully articulate essay about it. Ehrenreich reasons through concrete, real-world examples as well as appeal to pathos to convincingly reveal that the common practice of gratitude has definately become about the self as opposed to about others.
Essay:Introduction The directions below are representative of what students will encounter on test day. The essay gives you an opportunity to show how effectively you can read and comprehend a passage and write an essay analyzing the passage.
In your essay, you should demonstrate that you have read the passage carefully, present a clear and logical analysis, and use language precisely. Your essay must be written on the lines provided in your answer booklet; except for the planning page of the answer booklet, you will receive no other paper on which to write. You will have enough space if you write on every line, avoid wide margins, and keep your handwriting to a reasonable size.
Remember that people who are not familiar with your handwriting will read what you write. In this essay, organization and language errors such as syntactically awkward sentences and sentence fragments detract from the quality of the writing and often impede understanding, leading to a score of 2.
Bogard begins his argument by first providing a story from his personal experience, appealing to the reader by adding imagery. This example gives Bogard a sense of voice and his use of comparison is definitely effective. Not cancer! Reading—2: This writer demonstrates some comprehension of the passage.
However, this is the last evidence of understanding the writer provides, as the essay ends almost immediately afterward. Overall, the writer has demonstrated partial understanding of the source text. Analysis—2: The response offers some limited analysis of the source text, demonstrating partial understanding of the analytical task.
However, the writer does not elaborate on this point. In each instance of analysis in this short response, the writer identifies the use of evidence or rhetorical features, but asserts rather than explains the importance of those elements.
Overall, this response demonstrates partially successful analysis. Writing—2: This response demonstrates limited cohesion and some skill in the use of language. Although the writer offers a central claim that guides the essay, there is no indication of an introduction or conclusion to frame ideas. Overall, sentences are clear and the writer generally observes the conventions of standard written English. However, by the end of this short response, the writer has deviated from a formal style and objective tone Oh, no!
On the whole, this response offers some evidence of cohesion and control of language. Bogard builds his arguement in a few different ways. By using a personal story Bogard allows his audience to connect to him. If his audience can relate or even understand his story they will be more willing to agree with him. In his personal story Bogard uses great imagery making the audience picture what he saw and maybe make them want to experience it too.
By stating this people who are younger then 35 might feel that they were robbed of the oppurtunity to experience the real beauty of natural darkness. This would proably help his younger audience to agree with him because they might want the chance to see the real beauty of natural darkness. Bogard writes about the benefits that natural darkness actually produces. In the article he talks about how darkens actually helps the body produce a hormone that keeps certain cancers from developing.
He also includes how darkness helps and is neccessary for certain animals. These examples will help his audience see that he is arguing for some benefical for people. This also helps appeal to an audience that might not care for the beauty of darkness but care for their own personal health. Bogard uses different features in order to persuade his audience.
The different features also help him in appealing to a broader audience. Reading—3: This response demonstrates effective understanding of the passage, with increasing evidence as the response continues. In the next paragraph, the writer cites and discusses a generational claim that Bogard makes, again demonstrating comprehension.
Nevertheless, in this example and others like it in the response, the writer exhibits effective analysis of the source text using relevant and sufficient support. Writing—3: This essay is mostly cohesive and demonstrates mostly effective control of language.
The essay then follows a clear, if formulaic, format. By stating this Sentence structure is varied, and some precise phrasing is used to convey ideas robbed of the oppurtunity, their own personal health. Language control on the whole is good, although there are a few minor errors These examples will help his audience see that he is arguing for some benefical for people that do not detract materially from the quality of writing.
Overall, the response demonstrates proficient writing. Sample 6 Scores: 4 1 3 Paul Bogard strongly believes that natural darkness should be preserved. In order to prove the need for natural darkness, Bogard divides his argument into three main topics, saying that natural darkness is beneficial to humans, essential to humans, and essential to ecosystems.
According to Bogard, natural darkness can be a positive help to humans. One of the ways it can accomplish this is by giving enjoyment to onlookers. To supplant this, Bogard gives a personal example of how he enjoyed seeing meteors dart across the night sky in Minnesota as a child. Also he states that natural darkness can be a source of solitude. Supporting this claim, Bogard states that darkness is invaluable to every religion. Additionally Bogard says that the night sky has inspired countless numbers of philosophers, artists, and stargazers for millennia.
Bogard then gives a scientific case that shows why natural darkness is essential to humans. He points to the necessity of darkness in producing melatonin, a hormone that helps prevent certain cancers from developing in the human body. Bogard then concludes his argument that darkness is essential to human well-being by analyzing sleep. He first makes the obvious claim that darkness is essential for sleep. Then, he talks about the negative health effects of sleep disorders. He notes that there are a variety of nocturnal and crepuscular species of birds, fish, mammals, insects, and reptiles worldwide.
He gives two specific, well-known examples of these species; these discussed the species of North American birds that migrate at night and the sea turtles that lay their eggs on the shore at night. He also gives a couple of lesser-known examples, involving bats and moths that show the positive actions that some nocturnal animals perform.
He then concludes his argument for nocturnal darkness necessary to nature with persuasion, saying that removing natural darkness would essentially destroy an ecology that took billions of years to develop. Here, Bogard uses scientific fact to prove that natural darkness is a key to nature and ecology. Paul Bogard supports the preservation of natural darkness.
By using a personal story Bogard allows his audience to connect to him. Bogard extends the facts to offer various solutions. The writer provides various details from the text that support these points. Who knows what this vision of the night sky must inspire in each of us, in our children or grandchildren? Also he states that natural darkness can be a source of solitude. Bogard then concludes his argument that darkness is essential to human well-being by analyzing sleep.
In this essay, organization and language errors such as syntactically awkward sentences and sentence fragments detract from the quality of the writing and often impede understanding, leading to a score of 2. Overall, this response demonstrates advanced reading comprehension. By using a personal story Bogard allows his audience to connect to him. This furthers his line of argumentation because it shows how steps can be and are being taken to preserve natural darkness. Bogard begins his argument by first providing a story from his personal experience, appealing to the reader by adding imagery.