Revising your Argument Inevitably, the previous stage will turn up things you hadn't thought of and books with better things to say about the topic. But there are problems here. Some of the examples of historical essays that you may be asked to write on include: Agrarian revolution. Relevance Witnesses in court promise to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. You use evidence uncritically. Purpose The purpose of this guide is to provide you with the basics for writing undergraduate history essays and papers.
Thus, the subject of the question is the 'Y' rather than the 'X' element. You should familiarize yourself with those abbreviations, but your professor may not use them. Besides, your training as a historian should give you a healthy skepticism of the giddy claims of technophiles. If the document is unsigned, what can you infer about the author or authors? It is an effective strategy, especially when writing a short essay, to begin with a bold, attention-grabbing, first sentence which shows the marker that you know what you are doing: that is, answer the question as briefly as possible with your first sentence. Then you can decide on the different factors that explain his rise.
Narrow down your objective — history is very wide, and therefore it is almost impossible to write about everything on a topic that you may have been allocated. Also, you divide the overall question into more manageable sub-divisions, or smaller questions, on each of which you will subsequently write a paragraph. What sorts of explicit or implicit ideological or methodological assumptions does the author bring to the study? The scandal did not become public until after the election. Note also that the two clauses are now parallel—both contain transitive verbs.
The second sentence says that some colonists did not want to break with Britain and is clearly true, though you should go on to be more precise. Historical analysis is critical; it evaluates sources, assigns significance to causes, and weighs competing explanations. You may already write well.
A strong conclusion explains the importance and significance of what you have written.
For whom? Write in an active voice.
The key to a good body portion of your essay is to remember to only discuss 1 major idea per paragraph. If you have difficulty locating information, seek advice from your teacher or someone you trust. Finally, two hints: If your word-processing program underlines something and suggests changes, be careful.
Does the author actually use all of the material in the bibliography, or is some of it there for display? A historical monograph is not a novel—unless the historian is making everything up. Some of the examples of historical essays that you may be asked to write on include: Agrarian revolution. Choosing the right resource for your research will help enhance the credibility of the information that you are presenting in your paper.
Start with the subject and follow it quickly with an active verb. For example, does the author rely strictly on narrative and anecdotes, or is the book analytical in some way? If you must discuss methodology, do it in a preface; discussing sources is fine, but in a bibliographical essay. It serves both as an answer to the question and the focal point of your writing. All history students should swear a similar oath: to answer the question, the whole question and nothing but the question. Your professor may allow parenthetical citations in a short paper with one or two sources, but you should use footnotes for any research paper in history.
Although it is generally recognized that everything an individual has thought has probably been influenced to some degree by the previously expressed thoughts and actions of others, such influences are general. Historians value plain English. Do not relegate the real point or points of the paper to the conclusion. Quite often in essays students give a generalisation and back it up with the opinion of an historian — and since they have formulated the generalisation from the opinion, the argument is entirely circular, and therefore meaningless and unconvincing.