Rather, keep an open mind and analyze each piece a little deeper. Take notes on the medium, the subject matter, the tone of the piece, the theme, and whatever it was that made it stand out to you.
While each piece of artwork can evoke a different feeling or make you think a certain way, the entire exhibition, as a whole, could elicit an entirely different reaction.
Describe the novelties applied by the artist in this picture. Express your own impression of the picture. Explain how exactly it impressed you, to what thoughts it pushed, and what memories and associations it caused. If your opinion does not coincide with the reaction of critics, explain why you took this picture in such a way, and not otherwise.
How to Write an Art Exhibition Review To express your impressions of the exhibition, you can use the resources of two genres. In the review, you can focus on evaluating the works of art that you saw. A review is designed to evaluate works of art. In the introduction, tell the reader about where the exhibition is held and what it is devoted to.
Briefly introduce the concept of the event in the form in which it was formulated by the curators themselves — they usually provide such information at the time of the opening or afterward as an announcement on the site of the museum or gallery. Correlate the official concept with what you saw at the exhibition with your own eyes. You can move from general to particular and first describe the impression that you received from all the works in general.
And only after this, speculate on the impressions that have developed. Or, use the method of induction. Stop in detail on all significant works. If this is important in this case, tell us about the creator of each object, its creative evolution, and favorite techniques. Give an assessment of each work, arguing it. Read it out loud and see if it makes sense. Further Information For further information and more discussions about writing a formal analysis, see the following.
Some of these sources also give a lot of information about writing a research paper in art history, that is, a paper more ambitious in scope than a formal analysis.
Stokstad and M. The question whether fan art is legitimate art or not has become one of the most debatable topics today, when people have become so crazy about some artists or characters that there are huge events such as Comic Con which have a great deal with fan art. The artists produce works, which can be in different forms like literature, music or visual art, then they want people to respect and appreciate their work. Be sure to review the Lecture and the Discussion area for additional details and guidance.
Please complete the following steps below, returning a separate peer review worksheet for each of the two classmates whose papers you review.
Explain how exactly it impressed you, to what thoughts it pushed, and what memories and associations it caused. Since there are many different forms of art and most of it is up to the interpretation of the artist or the audience, art has no one singular defining characteristic. Allow time to proofread your paper.