People feel a sense of belonging when they can log onto the Internet and see the people they can talk to. Unfortunately, despite the number of people everyone can connect with, there are lower standards for what constitutes a friend. Relationships are casual online interactions rather than legitimate friendships. Another consequence of social media is the creation of cyber-bullying. People in all age groups now find themselves the object of scorn and derision through message boards.
This unfortunate byproduct can have dreadful repercussions for both bullies and the bullied. Finally, social media has become a distraction and decreased productivity. Students doing homework are likely to be pulled towards scouring social media to check on their friends. Rather than pursuing hobbies, people are more likely to spend time pursuing artificial relationships they established online.
Social media has ultimately provided a source of addicting distraction that has turned the world into unproductive workers. Thus when all factors are considered, the presence of social media has simply brought about too many negative repercussions for people. It has replaced genuine relationships with impersonal interactions. It has introduced a new and almost unpunishable form of bullying.
Also, it has become a distraction, turning people into unproductive workers. The snowball effect of negative repercussions is astounding when examined in unison.
Question: Summarize the points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they address the specific concerns for social media described in the reading passage. Lecture: pause Sample Essay: The reading and the lecture are both about negative effects of social media.
The reading states that three negative impacts of social media on the society are a false sense of connectedness, cyber-bullying, and decreased productivity. The lecture builds upon those same ideas to give a more comprehensive picture with three examples. First of all, according to the reading, one negative consequence of social media is that it destroys relationships. Supporting this idea, the lecturer explains that people have begun to put more value on computer-based relationships rather than real life ones.
He frames this idea as people losing touch with the real world, losing genuine relationships, and social skills. Secondly, the reading states that another negative consequence of social media is cyber-bullying. This is when someone uses the internet to tease or harass someone, oftentimes anonymously. The lecturer goes on the explain that according to a CBS report, 42 percent of young people have experienced cyber-bullying.
This high percentage indicates that social media has become a medium for cyber-bullying. Finally, the reading claims that social media is a huge distraction for people. Instead of doing work or homework, people use social media to distract them from their obligations.
In support of this idea, the lecturer brings up the point that the decrease in work productivity due to the overuse of social media has cost some businesses billions of dollars in lost revenue. For instance, one study done by Morse showed that British industries lost 2. In conclusion, the reading and lecture both discuss adverse impacts of the prevalence of social media on the society. The three main points made in the reading are effectively supported by the lecturer. To learn how to tackle this scenario, sign up for a 7 day free trial.
Your job is to plan and write an essay in response to this question. An "Agree or Disagree" question will give you a statement of opinion and ask you whether you agree or disagree with the statement. You will also have to provide specific reasons and examples to support your position. Here are examples: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All students should be required to study art and music in secondary school. Use specific reasons to support your answer. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. Question 27 Some students prefer to study alone. Others prefer to study with a group of students. Which do you prefer? Question 28 Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. You need to think fast, write fast and correct writing fast.
Choose a topic and set a timer for thirty minutes. Try to spend the entire 30 minutes writing, without stopping. When the timer is finished, read your writing carefully to see how you did. How was your grammar? How many sentences could you write? Do this several times per week. Think quality, not quantity. Shorter, well-written responses are fine. Many of the responses that receive scores of 4 or 5 are only one paragraph long.
On the other hand, many longer responses receive only a 2 or a 3. Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be to words. Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading. He says that the theory stated in the passage was very different and somewhat inaccurate when compared to what happened for real.
First, some members got free rides. This also indicates that people who worked hard was not given recognition they should have got. This derectly contradicts what the passage indicates.
Second, groups were slow in progress. The passage says that groups are nore responsive than individuals because of the number of people involved and their aggregated resources. However, the speaker talks about how the firm found out that groups were slower than individuals in dicision making.
Groups needed more time for meetings, which are neccesary procceedures in decision making. This was another part where experience contradicted theory. Third, influetial people might emerge, and lead the group towards glory or failure. After reading the passage, you will then listen to a lecture on the same topic. However, the reading passage may or may not have a different point of view from the lecture. There are a total of two different scenarios that you can encounter.
Contradiction: The lecture contradicts or casts doubt on the key points in the reading passage. Supporting with Examples: The lecture supports the key points in the reading passage. Below you will see writing templates for both scenarios. However, the lecturer disputes this point. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. Whereas the author of the reading states that his memoir is an inaccurate document, the lecturer suggests that the memoir is a reliable record.
The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three arguments. Furthermore, she mentions that the Chevalier just had to borrow money for a few days while he waited for his property to be sold.
Secondly, the reading states that the conversations recorded in the memoir may not be very accurate. These conversations occurred many years before the memoir was written, so it would have been impossible for the Chevalier to remember them accurately.
She argues that Chevalier often recorded conversations in his journals each night after the conversations took place. The Chevalier wrote down everything he could remember from them. In addition, she points out that there were witnesses confirming that the Chevalier regularly consulted these notes when writing his memoir years later. Finally, the reading claims that the Chevalier's depiction of his own escape from a famous prison in Venice cannot possibly be honest since the Chevalier could have asked politically well-connected friends to offer his jailers a bribe to free him.
On the other hand, the lecture believes that other prisoners who had even more powerful political connections were never able to bribe their way to freedom, so the Chevalier probably couldn't either. Hit the ground running as you study by using a writing template, allowing you to get your thoughts organized.
To begin with, social media has created a false sense of connectivity and friendship. The simple answer? Is it asking for the comparison of two different things or is it asking you to describe advantage and disadvantage of one thing? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.