These are major issues the university will face that will lead to the athletic departments of universities becoming businesses instead of helping athletes receive an education. Scholarships were not intended to be a way to attract top athletes to a school who have no interest in gaining an education.
Some may argue that athletes like Johnny Manziel, who get their name sold on things should make money. As soon as athletes start being paid, the universities will become popular to athletes because of how much they are paying the athlete instead of who can offer the best education. Athletic departments will start talking to athletes about business deals and negotiating money. Student athletes should not be paid because they get beneficial scholarships, they know what they are signing up for when they sign their National Letter of Intent, and students athletes are in college for an education first before being an athlete.
We do not just play for the exercise. We play because every moment that we are on the field is a minute where all of our problems disappear. We play for that one game when all the hours of practicing come together and our play is flawless. As of right now, these athletes are not getting paid, but many of them truly believe that they should. It is a big topic now days in the world of sports on weather college athletes should be getting paid to play sports.
College athletics have gained great popularity of the past few decades, and have brought schools lots of revenue. A lot of college athletes think they should be getting paid for their services they do for their school. The players should be proud and passionate about how winning a game will bring gratification Schneider and Robert They should do it for the completion and the glory it brings.
It is a chance to play a game a person is passionate about for another four year. Also it is a privilege rather than a job. The college athletes are not professional ones who are paid salaries and allowances for the sport careers. This is because in college a person has access to education through participation in sport where they earn the scholarship to pay tuition and other expenses. College athletes are not professional A student athlete focuses on education and sport unlike professionals who focussed on sports alone.
This makes the student athlete to be more passionate about sport because they are playing for the school rather than the money. If the athlete were to get compensation the innocence would be taken away. The funds that are used for academics would also reduce if they were to get paid. Also being an athletic student one is already isolated from university; therefore, compensation would increase this gap.
At the end, the athletic departments would become more of a business rather than focus on helping the athlete to attain education. According to Bleacher report scholarship are met to facilitate education for student who cannot afford to attend universities. Neither were they to attract top athletes to school who had no intention to get education. When the students are allowed to be compensated, that is what a scholarship would become.
Nowadays, full scholarships are awarded to the most talented athletes rather than the needy student who cannot afford college education; universities appeals through athletic programs making it harder to attain a scholarship "Federal student aid" par 6. If the athletes were to get paid, university popularity would be measured on the amount of compensation instead of the quality education offered.
In other words paying the student will be harmful to both universities and students. Disadvantage to small universities Additionally, if all universities started paying athletes, this would make a difference between bigger and smaller university athletic teams. A bigger university has more revenue; therefore, it can be able to obtain the best player. On the other hand, smaller universities would not be able to afford them thus will be disadvantaged. The college sports should not be centred on the money alone.
Although the debate is currently balanced on both sides, it is not ethical to pay student athletes. For a division I athlete, they are clearly already getting a full ride leaving with a college degree and no debt. Why should they be paid more. One clear reason that it is not ethically right is the title IX situation, another would be the benefit compared to the cost Essay - In recent years, the debate on whether or not student athletes should be paid for their athletic duties has been a rising issue.
The scholarship includes tuition, books, food, and housing.
They join college sports to sharpen their skills in the particular field.
Money is indeed the major basis of evil, but what further disassociates a student is when academic capabilities are overshadowed by athletics.
There are many people who have suggested several reasons why the college athlete should be allowed to get compensation, but those arguments are not adequate because the main objective of a university is to educate rather than provide sports entertainments. The revenue obtained is used to pay salaries to the staff. According to Bleacher report scholarship are met to facilitate education for student who cannot afford to attend universities. While representing the university, they also will represent the companies that sponsor the universities and the team.
It is a chance to play a game a person is passionate about for another four year. Therefore, student athlete should not be paid. Although the debate is currently balanced on both sides, it is not ethical to pay student athletes.
Colleges paying students to perform is not merited and would only cause more problems. If the athletes are paid for playing sports then going to other students will be forced to ask for payments because they participate in different activities. The access to education is dependant upon continuous participation in sports for which they receives the scholarship. Before signing, student-athletes are aware that they cannot receive extra benefits from other organizations. Williams, who is the director of the government's department for overseeing sports in colleges argues that college sports requires about forty hours in a week for training, practicing, viewing relevant films, learning plays, travelling and participating in actual sports.
Also they represent the organizations that sponsor those universities including Nike, Adidas and Under Amour. There are different viewpoints from different people stating if they should or not.
Though many are in favour of salaries, the universities spend a lot of money for the players benefit and also for the sport to which they participate in. The colleges that win their Division title, their Conference title, or the National championship, give bonuses to the Head coach of that Should College Athletes Be Paid? Many people say student athletes should receive compensation according to their specific needs because they spend so much time earning their scholarship and have no time to work.